I almost swore I would never read his site again, let alone link to it, but this is too funny.

In Saturday’s NatPost, Andrew Coyne writes a typically scathing indictment of the Chretien administration’s corrupt handling of the sponsorship file. In passing, he fingers Warren Kinsella as a party to this corruption.

Later that day, Kinsella declares Coyne to be a “liar”, and his piece to be “at best, false–and, at worst, malevolent and deliberate.” (Ed note: Warren: learn how to use an M-dash. I have cleaned up your sophomoric error for use in my blog. Moreover, learn how to employ permalinks. It’s not like you don’t have enough free time!)

Coyne responds with a thorough refutation of Kinsella’s accusations, including a quote-by-quote summary of the evidence against Kinsella.

Kinsella takes a day to mull his options, and today comes out with this:

I am declaring an armistice with Coyne/Spector/Wells/dozens of deservedly anonymous white’n'right bloghaters who [sic] I periodically torment for amusement.

Classy. And so gentlemanly! But you know, it did raise one question in my mind: when the losing side declares an armistice, isn’t that called “surrender”?